Study: Medical Admissions’ relationship with Innovations Can Cause Unintended Disruption in Admitted Students

diverse doctors clipart

MSC Dive Brief:

  • Since 2007, when the MCAT switched from a paper-based format to a revised computer-based format, technologies have been disrupting medical school admissions, such as situational judgement tests (SJTs) like the CASPer and the standardized video interview (SVI), a new study reports conducted by Canadian researchers and published in the Journal of the Association of American Colleges. 
  • The research has various implications for students hailing from a rural or international background learning for the MCAT as applicants must be able to achieve a certain score in order to be in serious consideration for admissions. Furthermore, the lead author of the study, Dr. Mark D. Hanson, pondered whether the advance of technologies which reduce human contact, whether by eliminating the need for an evaluator or a physical interviewer, increase the effect that convenient access has on how and why we conduct the admissions process.
  • Earlier studies have noted the idea that Artificial Intelligence (AI) may impact the practice of healthcare in the US, but Hanson states that none have looked at the impact that technologies were having on medical admissions now. The global impact of the MCAT, SJTs, and SVI may actually hinder those who are trying to gain access to medical education in the US, and increase the already present divide between rural and urban medical school applicants.

MSC Dive Insight:

Creating a fair and equitable admissions process is a noble goal, but there needs to be a discussion about specifics as well when the process is driven by academic capitalism. These problems with already-present computerized tests which assess personality and “human touch” through a screen may actually accentuate local institutional and national student diversity problems.

For example, data which is collected by the MCAT during a U.S. based examination was the same as a Canadian examination until 2016, and notably left out several minority groups who took the examination (First Nations, Inuit, etc.) which have been recognized by the Canadian government. Because no data are collected about these test-takers, they are essentially invisible to the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) when they look at who is applying to medical school.

Communities who are not as vocal may not be able to change implicit biases against them when it comes to the CASPer, which is a type of SJT which imposes yet another financial burden on students when trying to send scores (which applicants cannot see) to medical schools. Reducing the “human touch” aspect in favor of convenience may not be equated with utility in medical admissions.

Medical school applicants should be wary of these biases when studying for the MCAT, because there is a lot of variability when it comes to college classes. The MCAT is standardized (albeit with the drawbacks mentioned in the study) and therefore, the information that one needs to learn is clear. Adjusting the test for local demographic changes needs to be done in a socially responsible manner which aligns incentives with academic capitalism. For the applicant, this means that while doing these tests, remembering to stay true to oneself and your individual identity. The medical school admissions process, while disrupted by technology, can still be engineered to one’s benefit. If one has the right tutors and self-awareness of how the technology used during admissions, they will also know how it will affect the school’s eventual decision.


Hanson, M. D., & Eva, K. W. (2019). A Reflection Upon the Impact of Early 21st Century Technological Innovations on Medical School Admissions.Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

Medical Schools that Accept International Students


The medical school admissions process is competitive enough as it is! But as an international applicant, it’s even harder. There’s a limited number of medical schools in the US that accept or even interview international students. A good place to start making your list if you are an international student is to understand which MD schools even interview international applicants. This list below should help you as it lists medical schools that interview and eventually accept international students.

Interviews for International Medical School Applicants

School Name Number of International Students Interviewed
Wayne State University School of Medicine 93
Boston University School of Medicine 68
Georgetown University School of Medicine 65
Saint Louis University School of Medicine 54
Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine 52
Harvard Medical School 49
West Virginia University School of Medicine 48
Yale School of Medicine 43
Weill Cornell Medical College 41
Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine 38
University of Virginia School of Medicine 36
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine 34
Northwestern University The Feinberg School of Medicine 34
Stanford University School of Medicine 31
University of Kentucky College of Medicine 29
University of Hawaii, John A. Burns School of Medicine 28
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine 27
Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons 26
New York Medical College 22
Albert Einstein College of Medicine of yeshiva University 21
Emory University School of Medicine 21
Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth 21
New York University School of Medicine 21
Chicago Medical School at Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science 20
University of Chicago Division of the Biological Sciences The Pritzker School of Medicine 20
Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine 19
Loma Linda University School of Medicine 18
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine 18
University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry 16
Duke University School of Medicine 15
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai 15
Stony Brook University School of Medicine 15
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences 12
Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania 12
Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University 12
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine 11
Howard University College of Medicine 9
State University of New York Upstate Medical University 9
University of California, Los Angeles David Geffen School of Medicine 9
University of Maryland School of Medicine 8
Creighton University School of Medicine 7
University of Texas Southwestern Medical School at Dallas Southwestern Medical School 6
Mayo Medical School 5
University of Utah School of Medicine 5
Medical College of Wisconsin 4
Michigan State University College of Human Medicine 4
Rutgers, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School 4
Tulane University School of Medicine 4
The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University 3
University of California, Davis, School of Medicine 3
University of Connecticut School of Medicine 3